|
As the baby boom generation trudges along its inexorable path to
the grave, everything it does is good copy. The reason is
simple: baby boomers are the largest single demographic
phenomenon in the world today, and they're endlessly fascinated
by themselves.
So they reach adolescence, and society gets a bad case of acne;
the Youth Culture of the 60's. They reach adulthood, find out
they have to work for a living, and Yippie turns to Yuppie.
Now they've all discovered breeding, and the shock waves are
being felt from the maternity wards to the psychiatrist's couch.
The psychiatrists' couches are busy because modern baby boomers
are having a tough time throwing themselves into a successful
career and family with equal measures of customary gusto.
When baby boomers have babies themselves, they discover that
children, unlike jogging, racquetball, and other trivial
pursuits, aren't as easily abandoned as a pair of $60 running
shoes.
In fact, children require a lifetime of commitment, and, unlike most
other baby-boom pursuits, return few immediate tangible rewards. Now
and then, children stimulate in their jaded parents the recognition
that life itself is gratifying enough. But we're the recognition that
life itself is gratifying enough. But we're all so busy running ahead
that we rarely have time for such vague, existential stuff.
As a card-carrying baby boomer, it turns out I'm dealing with my
two kids the way I've dealt with everything else in my life -- me
first, justifications and rationalizations to follow. And so
they will.
The Busy Dad-Syndrome
First, let me say there is nothing new about the conflict between
career and kids. I suspect that every guy reading this remembers
a dad who wasn't around as often as he should have been. We
heard he was pulling down late duty at the office, or he had to
go to a meeting, or to some exotic, faraway place like Toronto.
Dad was a busy guy. He worked all the time.
It wasn't until we got old enough to be dads ourselves, after our
mothers got a snootful of screwdrivers at some family function,
that we learned Dad's absences often had as much to do with his
propensity for sport as for work. But when we were six, it was
enough to know that dads were rare and precious, and to be
coveted.
Of course, when he was around, Dad was not always worth the wait.
How many of us had dads who would drop the 5:15 martini for a
session of catch or electric train? How many had dads who would
give us a swell new game for Christmas: Parcheesi or
Steeplechase, and then offer to play it with us "someday", even
though we would stand there, clutching our wonderful new thing,
all tousled hair and young boy smell, eyes beseeching a boon from
the whimsical god of paternity?
Mom, of course, was around all the time. That was before the era
of female emancipation. But Mom was in the same boat as us. She
had to haggle for time. And when the old boy got home, he would
just as soon go golfing with the boys, and he was no more likely
to take her along than us.
He was slippery, the old man. And the broken promises grew like
piles of oily rags in the basements of our minds. "Next weekend"
became his two favourite words. But no matter how tortured or
dejected we became, we were never disillusioned. We kept coming
back for more. Because we knew that those 11 minutes a week when
we were actually, gloriously, the sole thing on his mind (not
counting the times we were in trouble, which came to more than 11
minutes) were the best 11 minutes in the whole universe.
So I made a vow. When I got to be a dad, I'd have a lot more
than 11 minutes a week for my very best boy. And now that I am a
dad, I've kept it. My kids get as many as 13 minutes. Each.
The six-year old boy with the tousled hair and the boy smell,
standing there with the Parcheesi game, looks enough like me to
remind me of that poignant ache. He's bad enough. But
complicating the situation is a four-year old girl who has the
habit of wrapping her skinny little arms around her dad and
pleading for him to stay home from work for the morning.
There's something terribly wrong about the way we live that we
even have to make the choice. But we make it every day, and
willingly, sometimes eagerly, abandon our children to the nursery
school, the day care, the baby-sitter, and finally, to
themselves.
Do We Dislike Kids?
As Germaine Greer says in her newest polemic, Sex and Destiny, we
in the West simply do not like kids. The birthrate is falling,
and the kids we do have are born into a hostile world to the idea
that children are an asset, a blessing, fun to have around. We
men have always known what to do when asked to choose between
children and ourselves; now women, as they stride purposefully
into the marketplace, power-dressed to the nines, are beginning
to find that self-realization, North American style, doesn't mix
with nurturing a family.
"The individuals whom we have painstakingly inducted into
child-free society and established there, with a life-style
centred entirely upon achievement and self-gratification, have
now to disrupt the pattern," says Germaine about the mere
decision to have a child. "The sacrifice is enough, and they are
to expect no reward or recompense. If the management of
childbearing in our society had actually been intended to
maximize stress, it could have hardly succeeded better. The
child bearers embark upon their struggle alone; the rest of us
wash our hands of them."
Greer, for all her stridency, is not telling us anything we
haven't seen with our own eyes, but Sex and Destiny puts the
whole dirty secret out for public view. She contrasts our
child-hostile world to many places on earth where kids are still
thought of as the strength of the family, not bloody
inconveniences.
Today in Canada, children are confined to McDonald's,
Saturday-afternoon matinees, amusement parks, and schools.
Before we had our children, I hadn't had a conversation with a
kid since I was one. Occasionally, I'd run into one in the
supermarket or on the street, but wherever I went, the
environment had been carefully scrubbed of kids. That's okay
until you have children; but when you have time, you descend into
the subculture and become lost along with them.
I don't want this to read as nothing but a lament. Because one of
the things you discover is that the subculture is as much fun as
it was when you were a kid, I get to go to summer fairs and
skating rinks, see all the Walt Disney movies over again, and
watch Sesame Street, which they didn't have when I was a kid.
Sesame Street alone makes being a kid worth it.
Now and then I get a sneaky feeling that at this level, life is
more meaningful and fun than it is at the level of busy executive
and concerned citizen. But it's a feeling that strikes only in
the depths of the weekend, while I'm lounging on the river bank
with my best boy after a bike ride and a soda. By Sunday
afternoon, the adrenalin begins to pump in anticipation of
tomorrow and the titanic struggle to get ahead, and the poor
little things are reduced to tiny shadows of annoyance,
inconsequential things that must be put to bed.
Management vs. Kids
There is no place more incompatible with children than one's
place of work, especially if you see advancement as Something
You'd Like to Go For. Those dewy-eyed, cowed devotees to their
families must rush home every day at precisely 5 p.m. leaving the
store to those of us who are prepared to toll on into the night
for the greater glory of the firm and ourselves. It doesn't
matter what the business, the cardinal rule is invariably the
same. You must be prepared to put your job before God, Queen,
Country, and above all, family.
Family is viewed by management, no matter how enlightened, as a
personality flaw. Management is only reflecting the Germaine
Greer contention that the whole of society views breeding as
something faintly Third-World and unhygienic; and unless you're
willing to go along ... you're dogmeat career-wise.
Look at Dustin Hoffman in Kramer vs. Kramer. To hang on to one
snotty-nosed five-year old, he had to abandon his job as a big
time art director at a major New York agency, and go "back to the
board" at another, smaller concern, where it was tacitly
understood that he would remain until he could get over this
obsession with his kid.
The poor sap taught to achieve since he was a little kid is faced
with the prospect of turning his back on everything he loves: to
attain the respect of his peers, job satisfaction, and a big
enough salary to keep his family in the manner to which he thinks
they are accustomed.
He looks at the inside postal workers of the world with disdain
and a little pity. He has vice-presidents to conquer, and
nothing, nobody, is going to stand in the way. Now and then, he
feels a little guilty, but that's a guilt that can be easily
assuaged by the occasional ball game or bedtime story.
So far, this could be Gary Cooper's dilemma in The Man in The
Gray Flannel Suit. But there are a few twists and turns that
bring this story into the 1980's. For instance, the emancipation
of women.
At least, that's what it's called. Although virtually any man
can testify that working your ass off for 50 years is hardly
emancipation. But we hardly have a right to speak on the matter.
Women have to cross the road to get to the other side, so
they're abandoning the nest in unprecedented numbers in pursuit
of the same kinds of objectives I referred to above.
Female emancipation sets off a chain of events. Men can no
longer depend on free home care for their children, and as we're
not about to pick up the slack, we grumble, dig a little deeper,
and pay professionals to look after our children, although many
of them are professionals only in that they take money. No one,
at this point, is really sure what a childcare professional is.
They're busy finding out, and they're finding out on our kids.
Mashed Food and Duckies
Equally catastrophic is what it does to the relationship. For
one thing, more and more wives are inclined to put off child
rearing until their careers are well underway. Which means that
you're likely to be too old to be a young father, and she's even
less capable of coping with the lost sleep, the stretch marks,
and the descent into the subculture. She and her sisters have
fought the good fight for more than 100 years, only to be stuck
back in a world littered with baby faeces, mashed food and
duckies.
If the 20-year old male is disinclined to cope with this stuff,
the 30 and 35-year old males are even less inclined. We're right
in the middle of the race for vice-president, and while we'll go
to the Lamaze classes and attend the blessed event, there's no
way we're going to take on the added burden of looking after the
fruit of our loins.
This can lead to disenchantment on the part of the wife.
And, although you hate to say it, wives lose some of their allure
when they get pregnant. Not necessarily because they walk and
look like plastic inflatable penguins, but because they've become
somebody's mother, somebody else's mother.
It's a phenomenon that psychologists have already well
documented. Men are more likely to fool around after their first
child is born than at any time other than their mid-life crisis.
Your partner and lover turns into a baby maintenance specialist,
and all that stuff she used to tolerate - working late at the
office, getting up early to run, golfing on the weekends - that's
over now, as you're expected to at least dabble in the arts of
diaper changing, feeding, and kootchie-kooing.
It's the kind of behaviour that can turn a guy right off, and
more than one formerly faithful husband goes looking for that
pre-infant allure someplace else, leaving mom at home with the
apple of their eye.
But who do they think we are anyway? It's us or them.
I thought I might be able to get through this without mentioning
the word "yuppie" once. But I find that here is a perfect place
for it.
The Yuppie couple believes the secret to life is buying quality.
Not ordinary quality, but exotic quality. Yuppies have children
the same way they have cars, the smart way.
In this respect, Yuppie is just a new word for fool. Because the
Yuppie will find out that children cannot be solved like other
consumer dilemmas. It doesn't matter how many books you read, or
how much money you have, or what kind of baby car seat you buy,
or what Montessori school you send them to, children are not like
all the other commodities they encounter. Children, unlike
contentment, cannot be bought. Children are the Yuppie Achilles
heel. They disturb the unruffled calm. They shatter the
illusion of competency. Children are the worm of guilt in the
apple of complacency.
Not that they get any thanks for it. Yuppie children are
certainly better dressed than the offspring of ordinary schmos.
They look healthier. They know how to read when they're four.
They play with creative, non-sexist, attention-grabbing toys.
But they're not any more loved or respected.
Abandoned by both Mommy and Daddy, the average Canadian kid is
becoming more and more a creature of TV, of the toys he plays
with, his little pals, and society at large. They're not Our
kids any more, they're theirs. When we have them, which is rare
in itself, we let them slip away.
I can see the signs, day after day. My boy will sit with the
only adult friend he has who will talk to him for hours - his
Speak and Spell - learning to spell frantically so the machine
will tell him nice things such as: You are Correct. Perfect
Score.
My daughter would like to know just about everything, and is not
above asking all the questions, all day long. How are teddy
bears made? How do you make windows? Who is the Sandman? I
don't have time for these questions, so I buy her another Barbie
Doll, even though I swore I'd never get one of those things.
After I buy her off, it's the feeling of complacency that wells
up inside like flatulence that disturbs me the most.
Who do I blame? Myself? Poor vessel that I am, I'm not capable
of making such bold choices in isolation from my peers. The
fundamentalists blame feminism for the breakdown of the family,
but as Germaine acidly points out, no room was made for children
long before the feminists got into the act. Feminism, like
Yuppiedom, is just another inappropriate response to the puzzle
of misery in the midst of plenty.
I suppose I could blame Rene Descartes, who's been held
responsible for the illusion that we are rational beings the
moment he uttered the phrase, "I think, therefore I am." Poor
Rene.
I usually end up blaming my kids. For being too noisy, for
getting up and going to bed at the wrong times. For wanting me to
be with them. For wanting me to love them at least as much as I
love myself. For being alive.
At least I count myself more fortunate than those sad mortals who
are still trying to decide if children fit into their life-style.
The answer is, of course not, dummy. But have them anyway.
They're our last link, to Mother Earth. If you don't have them,
the state will have to go into the business of having kids. As
the state does most everything for us now, childbearing is a
natural extension. People spawned in stainless-steel wombs are
not likely to get involved in hand-wringing about anything.
Oh Brave New World, indeed
|